Mar 19
This video is for educational purposes only. Attorney, Tom Cryer, won a unanimous NOT GUILTY verdict in federal district court defeating the IRS’s claim that Tom “willfully” failed to file federal income tax returns. Tom refused to file tax returns because the IRS could not show him any law making him liable for ‘filing’ a tax return.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
Why called national when they are separate and in the control of their respective states? That was the question.
That definition just says California has its own militia and it is called Army National Guard. California pays them. Why is California’s militia refered to as National when it is typically confined to its state?
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
Agreed and no intelligent man today will call blacks sub human. The question is will we all live as free men, equal in all respects? Or will we all live as subhuman animals being property of the state having absolute control over our lives? Federal government, via 14th amendment, and the NWO represents the latter. It is a choice every one of will have to make real soon.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
Let me know. I haven’t found a plausibe reason for it if we accept that a state is not a nation and never was. Later..
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
Why does Govt Borrow money, why not simply Print it free of charge, no loan to pay back, no Govt debt, no need for income tax.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
Andrew Jackson threw out the central bank, and so Rothschilds paid for the war in 1812, gave us a giant loan that we could never pay off, and then reinstated a central bank.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
WHY,
Because we are stupid and our Government and the people that run them are crooks.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
exactly. thats the scam. every time a central bank was started in the USA eventually it was thrown out by the people. today the politicians are all corrupt and paid off so the power of the Fed isn’t threatened.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
They were wrong to believe that blacks were not fully human. It is commonly believed today (21st century) that neanderthals are human beings, too. And, notwithstanding, they even have the right to run for US President, so long as they are managed by an upper elite, superior in thought, advanced, evolved to bring the rest of humanity into a New World Order whereby they will continue to rule. This is fast becoming common knowledge. To hell with the old belief system of blacks being sub human!
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
The 13th did deem all men free. Of course some of them didn’t like that, why couldn’t those people be prosecuted. Why create the 14th? And many continue to think that to this day unfortunately.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
“Why do the states have National Guards”
TITLE 32 > CHAPTER 1 > ยง101. Definitions
(4) Army National Guard means that part of the organized militia of the several States and Territories, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia, active and inactive…
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
“Why couldn’t they just deem that everyone is as free as whitey?”
Put yourself back in that time, some people didn’t even think blacks were fully human.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
“National Guards?”
I have to look up the history of the NG for that one.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
Thankfully No it isn’t. He’s the putz that made me rethink a career in the service, that and I ask too many questions and that is not a good trait in the military. That’s a cop out. There are 18 different defs for ‘is’. They could change the context or meaning of his answer. I didn’t like it either but his question was valid. So you don’t really know what those thing are? Since when did Occam’s razor apply to law and politics?
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
Same here! ;^)
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
So congress creates undefined laws and the courts have to give them definitions later? Court decisions strictly interpret laws as legally defined and often they do a bad job and get overturned. There is a lot more going on there than you account for. You accept everything at face value, you would have made a good marine. Too bad about your folks. ;^)
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
What fun would that be, you know everything! Besides I am getting more info about you from the questions you choose to ignore. What is your nationality again? National Guards? etc. You ignore a lot. You seem to have a lot of time on your hands, was I too greedy? Sorry.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
Bouviers 1849, 1870, and Blacks law 1-4th, 1969. I use the definitions from law dictionary written around the time the law was passed. I don’t get them from websites written 150 years later. What were the non slaves? Were they persons in regards to the Fed or were they just persons in regard to thier state? And the states being the ‘persons’ in regards to the fed. Why couldn’t they just deem that everyone is as free as whitey? Why create another amendment, wasn’t the thirteenth enough? Cheers.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
“And define “its”. ”
LOL Is your name bill clinton?
Look up ‘Occam’s razor’.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
“Are you sure you weren’t a marine?”
Couldn’t join them, my parents were married.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
“More court decisions and no law?”
Court decisions define the law.
Reductio ad absurdum
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
“As opposed to inhabitant or domicile? ”
Your primary place of abode is your ‘domicile’, you may have multiple ‘residences’, or you could ‘inhabit’ a motel.
You could just look it up and save time asking me
Does that clarify it some?
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
“So what was everybody before the 14th amendment? ”
Before the 14th some were (ex)slaves and not considered ‘persons’.
“So if I am not a consenting member of US society I am not subject to “its” jurisdiction?”
No, you are subject due to where you live (reside)
A corporation may also be a ‘person’ for legal purposes.
“A person is a man considered according to the rank he holds in society”
How old is that definition?
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
“within its jurisdiction” Precisely what is its ‘jurisdiction’ ? And define “its”. ‘Its” refers to the United States possesively, what has been ceded to it by contract? I know of 76 non identical definitions for “United States” in the US code. Which one? More court decisions and no law? This is fun.
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
There is no such thing as an American national. What US Code defines the term “American National”?
“I don’t think I fit into a defined ‘nation’ as we have discussed.” So you make one up? American National? Fine, I am a California National. Why do the states have National Guards? Did they not know they weren’t a nation?
March 19th, 2009 at 8:19 am
Residence – As opposed to inhabitant or domicile? They are not synonomous. What makes you a resident as opposed to inhabitant? Can you be both? You create more question than you answer.