Comments on: There is NO LAW — US Lawyer Not Guilty of Tax Evasion

By: TaxTruth

TaxTruth — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 03:43:05 +0000

You are STILL babbling (idle or foolish talk, To utter a meaningless confusion of words).

Stealing:larceny-the act of taking something from someone unlawfully.

In the criminal law, theft (also known as stealing or filching) is the illegal taking of another person’s property without that person’s freely-given consent…

If it is lawful it cannot be, by definition, ‘stealing’.

By: doctorofghetto

doctorofghetto — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 03:43:05 +0000

By the way Tax Truth and everyone watching this video…While I am researching on the court case(s) and my local tax laws, do a Google Video search call “The Money Masters” By Bill Still. Maybe this video can help you understand of what I am imposing on Tax Truth and everyone else.

By: ifreemantoo

ifreemantoo — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 03:43:05 +0000

So if the 16th Amendment allowed legal stealing supported by USSC opinion, what would make people subject to legalized stealing?

Yick Wo v Hopkins 118 US 356
Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power.

By: doctorofghetto

doctorofghetto — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 03:43:05 +0000

Oh Nevermind…..Found it: United States v. Thomas
788 F.2d 1250 (7th Cir. 04/17/1986)

It was great conversating to you in this public comment section. I will contact you directly. Feel free ladies and gentleman to be invovle with this debate.

By: doctorofghetto

doctorofghetto — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 03:43:05 +0000

Or was it the case in Tennessee in 1996 about electronic bulletin board, still no relevance?